☂️ Snapdragon 835 Vs Exynos 9810

The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an Но вы также должны иметь в виду, что Snapdragon 845 был выпущен в 2018 году. Если вы хотите смартфон для игр, тогда стоит присмотреться к устройствам на Snapdragon 845, потому что он имеет лучший графический So găng 4 chipset đầu bảng: Snapdragon 845, Exynos 9810, Kirin 970 và Apple A11 Nguyễn Anh Tuấn 13/12/17 38 bình luận Tại hội nghị công nghệ ở Hawaii, Qualcomm cho ra mắt chipset thế hệ mới nhất Snapdragon 845. Họ tuyên bố rằng, Snapdragon 845 có hiệu suất lên đến hơn 30% so với Snapdragon 835 và còn hỗ trợ mạnh mẽ cho công nghệ VR. valentino donna acqua discontinued; samsung s10 internal storage other; basics of project management pdf. hinckley casino hotel phone number; alpinestars supertech gloves The Exynos 9810, just like the Snapdragon 835 is stated as being built using the 10nm process. It will feature four Mongoose M2 cores and four Cortex A53 cores. GPU will be a Mali-G71 clocked at 1d1k009. Home Mobile Exynos and Snapdragon have been neck and neck for years, but according to Geekbench, there's definitely a winner. Smartphones get more powerful every year, and with big hitters like the Samsung Galaxy S23 around the corner, we thought it would be pertinent to take a trip down memory lane and contextualize where these performance improvements really come from. Geekbench scores are a great way to get a high-level overview of the computational improvements from one generation to the next. They don't tell us anything else about a chipset or its power consumption, but they serve as a solid point of comparison. The data collected here comes from Geekbench 5 scores of every Samsung flagship from the Galaxy S5 onwards, and it's created from a median of 250 benchmarks run on each base device. This removes outliers and accounts for more powerful or even weaker devices that spoof legitimate Samsung phones. As expected, each generation nets performance improvements, but the results are an interesting look into the progression of smartphones over the years. About the data The data was collected for each unlocked device, and the model numbers are listed below. While Geekbench doesn't cover all aspects of a chipset, you'll find comparisons between CPU capabilities of each chip below. We display the median of the results in our graphs, and the computed median was always close to the computed mean. Device Chipset Model Samsung Galaxy S5 Snapdragon 801 SM-G900F Samsung Galaxy S5 Exynos 5422 SM-G900H Samsung Galaxy S5 Snapdragon 805 SM-G901F Samsung Galaxy S6 Exynos 7420 SM-G920F Samsung Galaxy S7 Exynos 8890 SM-G930L Samsung Galaxy S7 Snapdragon 820 SM-G930A Samsung Galaxy S8 Exynos 8895 SM-G950N Samsung Galaxy S8 Snapdragon 835 SM-G950U Samsung Galaxy S9 Exynos 9810 SM-G960F Samsung Galaxy S9 Snapdragon 845 SM-G960U1 Samsung Galaxy S10 Exynos 9820 SM-G973F Samsung Galaxy S10 Snapdragon 855 SM-G973U Samsung Galaxy S20 Exynos 990 SM-G986B Samsung Galaxy S20 Snapdragon 865 SM-G980F Samsung Galaxy S21 Exynos 2100 SM-G991N Samsung Galaxy S21 Snapdragon 888 SM-G9910 Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 2200 SM-S901B Samsung Galaxy S22 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM-S901E About Geekbench Geekbench is a CPU-centric test that uses several computational workloads including encryption, compression text and images, rendering, physics simulations, computer vision, ray tracing, speech recognition, and convolutional neural network inference on images. The score breakdown gives specific metrics. The final score is weighted according to the designer’s considerations, placing a large emphasis on integer performance 65%, then float performance 30%, and finally, cryptography 5%. It does not account for other improvements in the SoC or power consumption. Samsung Galaxy Exynos devices The progression of the company's Exynos processors since the Galaxy S5 has been interesting to look at. The Exynos 5422 is nowhere near what we would nowadays call a powerhouse, with a measly score of 176 in single-core and an equally weedy score of 322 in multi-core. For context, the Samsung Galaxy S22 with its Exynos 2200 SoC boasts just shy of a 10x improvement in multi-core speeds and a improvement in single-core speeds over the original Exynos 5422 that powered the Galaxy S5. That's a pretty major improvement as expected but shows how improvements are beginning to slow, as eight generations on, we don't see an 8x improvement in single-core scores. The jump from the Exynos 8895 to the 9810 was probably the biggest overall, with a large increase in single and multi-core performance. This particular score jump is likely due to the switch from Exynos M2 cores to Exynos M3 cores and an upgrade from Cortex A53 cores to Cortex A55. With an increase in cache size from 2MB to 4MB as well, we would see a decrease in cache miss rates and, in turn, a further improvement in performance as the CPU should be able to fetch more instructions from the cache instead of from the slower main memory. Further generations found a more even footing, with smaller but consistent increases of roughly 20% each time in single and multi-core performance. Samsung Galaxy Snapdragon devices Snapdragon chipsets are the cream of the crop in the Android world, and just like with the above Exynos results, these results show how far Qualcomm has come over the years. Starting off with single and multi-core scores of 156 and 445, respectively, we see massive leaps in both peaks with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Snapdragon 888. Given that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 has its own fair share of problems, it's not too surprising to see it fall behind a little bit in the single-core department. Interestingly, in contrast to the Exynos chipsets, there aren't any major jumps from one generation to the next. Instead, it's a relatively smooth and consistent improvement year over year. You may also notice that the Samsung Galaxy S6 is missing this is likely because of the problems that the Snapdragon 810 faced. It was the first 64-bit chip from Qualcommm and would overheat quite severely. It was even blamed for why the Nexus 5X and Nexus 6P faced major bootlooping problems. Samsung instead went with Exynos for global devices that generation. However, one thing is for sure Qualcomm has always scored ahead of the same generation Exynos chipset in every Samsung device except in the case of the Exynos 2100. Samsung Galaxy Exynos and Snapdragon devices For the wider context of how Snapdragon and Exynos compare across generations, it's clear that they've always been close in performance. There is never a major digression in these chipsets' capabilities, with differences usually boiling down to power consumption or real-world performance. In normal usage, they are more or less equally comparable, and the difference in results between these chipsets can similarly be found between two results run on the same device in different conditions. In short, these results show the neck-and-neck nature of the chipset performance race and how both Qualcomm and Samsung keep up with each other. Samsung appears to lag behind a little bit, but for the most part, both do quite well and Samsung is never too far behind Qualcomm in terms of its actual performance. There are many other ways to measure a chipset, and Geekbench measures one sole aspect of a device. We're looking forward to the Samsung Galaxy S23 series, and with rumors suggesting a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, it's possible that there may not even be an Exynos variant this year. We'll see! VS We compared two 8-core processors Samsung Exynos 9810 with Mali-G72 MP18 graphics and Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Adreno 540. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5SpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Samsung Exynos 9810 Announced 1-year and 2-months laterShows better up to 30% AnTuTu 9 score – 410K vs 316K18% higher CPU clock speed 2900 vs 2450 MHzBetter instruction set architecture Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Performs 53% better in floating-point computationsHigher GPU frequency ~29% Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 116977 82968 GPU 121725 105394 Memory 74973 49513 UX 93023 75726 Total score 410178 316666 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 93% 95% Graphics test 13 FPS 6 FPS Score 2272 1165 Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9810 and Snapdragon 835 CPU Architecture 4x GHz – Exynos M34x GHz – Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A734x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2900 MHz 2450 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache - 128 KB L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB Process 10 nanometers 10 nanometers Transistor count billion 3 billion TDP 5 W 9 W Graphics GPU name Mali-G72 MP18 Adreno 540 Architecture Bifrost 2 Adreno 500 GPU frequency 572 MHz 739 MHz Execution units 18 2 Shading units 288 384 FLOPS 370 Gigaflops 567 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1800 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 2x 32 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 6 GB 8 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Yes Hexagon 682 Storage type UFS UFS Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160 Max camera resolution 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS Video codecs VP9 VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem Shannon 360 X16 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 16 5G support No No Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 200 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 835 44 Total votes 139 Related Comparisons Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 835 and Exynos 9810, or ask any questions We compared the characteristics of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 and Samsung Exynos 9810 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2023 Snapdragon 835 benefits GPU frequency vs 572 Memory frequency vs 1800 Samsung Exynos 9810 benefits CPU 110029 27263 better vs 82766 GPU 143277 38493 better vs 104784 Total AnTuTu score 416105 100311 better vs 315794 Frequency 2900 450 better vs 2450 FLOPS 658 100 better vs 558 Comparison of all specifications AnTuTu 9 CPU 82766 110029 27263 better GPU 104784 143277 38493 better Memory 51047 67847 UX 76162 93390 Total AnTuTu score 315794 416105 100311 better GeekBench 5 Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark Stability no data 95% Graphics test 6 FPS 13 FPS Score 1132 2333 CPU Architecture 4x ГГц – Kryo 280 Cortex-A734x ГГц – Kryo 280 Cortex-A53 4x ГГц – Exynos M34x ГГц – Cortex-A55 Number of Cores 8 8 Frequency 2450 2900 450 better Instruction set ARMv8-A Process technology 10 нм 10 нм TDP 9 Вт 5 Вт L2 cache 2 МБ no data Number of transistors 3 млрд. млрд. L1 cache 128 КБ no data L3 cache no data 4 МБ graphics accelerator GPU Adreno 540 Mali-G72MP18 Architecture Adreno 500 Bifrost GPU frequency 710 138 better 572 Computing blocks 2 18 shader blocks 256 288 Vulcan version OpenCL Version DirectX Version 12 12 FLOPS 558 658 100 better RAM Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1866 66 better 1800 Tire 2x 32 Бит 4x 16 Бит Bandwidth До Гбит/сек До Гбит/сек Volume До 8 ГБ До 6 ГБ Multimedia neural processor Hexagon 682 Да Drive type UFS UFS Max. display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160 Max. camera resolution 1x 32МП, 2x 16МП 1x 24МП, 2x 16МП Video recording 4K при 30FPS 4K при 120FPS Video playback 4K при 60FPS 4K при 120FPS Codec support VP9 VP9 Audio AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Communications and networks 4G support LTE Cat. 16 LTE Cat. 19 5G support Нет Нет Download speed До 1000 Мбит/с До 1200 Мбит/с Download speed До 150 Мбит/с До 200 Мбит/с Wi-Fi 5 5 Bluetooth 5 5 Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Modem X16 LTE Shannon 360 LTE general information Class Флагман Флагман Model number MSM8998 S5E9810 56 características comparadasQualcomm Snapdragon 835Samsung Exynos 9810Por que Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 é melhor que Samsung Exynos 9810?Clock do GPU 138MHz mais rápido?710MHzvs572MHzPor que Samsung Exynos 9810 é melhor que Qualcomm Snapdragon 835?CPU mais rápida?4 x & 4 x x & 4 x mais rápidos?1200MBits/svs1024MBits/sUtiliza HMP?Carregamento mais rápido?200MBits/svs150MBits/s2 canais de memória a mais?4vs2Resultado do Geekbench 5 de núcleo único mais alto?685vs372Resultado do Geekbench 5 de múltiplos núcleos mais alto?2028vs1461Cache L1 256KB maior?384KBvs128KBAvaliações de usuáriosClassificação geralQualcomm Snapdragon 8354 Avaliações de usuáriosQualcomm Snapdragon Avaliações de usuáriosSamsung Exynos 98103 Avaliações de usuáriosSamsung Exynos Avaliações de usuáriosRecursoInformações geraisUm sistema operacional 32-bit pode suportar, no máximo, 4GB de RAM. Sistemas 64-bit permite mais do que 4GB, proporcionando maior desempenho. Também é possível executar aplicativos uma placa de vídeo integrada, você não precisa comprar uma placa pequenos proporcionam melhor desempenho e menor consumo de energia. Chipsets com um maior número de transistores, componentes semicondutores de dispositivos eletrônicos, oferecem mais poder computacional. Um fator de forma pequeno permite que mais transistores se encaixem em um chip, aumentando, assim, seu unidade de processamento gráfico GPU tem uma velocidade de clock mais DirectX é usado em games, com as versões mais novas suportando gráficos tecnologia sem fio 5G. A rede móvel de quinta geração oferece velocidades mais altas e latência menor do que a rede de quarta geração GPU Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Quando a GPU está rodando abaixo de suas limitações, ela pode aumentar a velocidade para um clock superior a fim de fornecer desempenho OpenGL ES Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810O OpenGL ES é usado para games em dispositivos móveis, tais como smartphones. As versões mais recentes suportam gráficos OpenCL Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Alguns aplicativos usam OpenCL para desfrutar do poder da unidade de processamento de gráficos GPU para computação não gráfica. As versões mais recentes introduzem mais funcionalidade e melhor velocidade da CPU ou processador indica quantos ciclos de processamento podem ser executados por uma CPU a cada segundo, considerando todos os seus núcleos unidades de processamento. Essa velocidade é calculada pela soma da capacidade de cada núcleo – ou, no caso de processadores multinúcleos que empregam diferentes microarquiteturas, de cada grupo de threads resulta em desempenho mais rápido e melhor a tecnologia um chip pode alternar entre dois conjuntos de núcleos de processador, a fim de maximizar o desempenho do aparelho e a duração da bateria. Durante uma partida de jogo, por exemplo, os núcleos mais potentes são utilizados para otimizar a performance, enquanto o ato de checar e-mails aciona núcleos menos potentes para prolongar a duração da Multiprocessamento Heterogêneo HMP - "Heterogenous Multi-Processing" é uma versão mais avançada da tecnologia Nesta configuração, o processador pode utilizar todos os núcleos ao mesmo tempo, ou apenas um núcleo para tarefas de baixa intensidade. Isso pode, respectivamente, fornecer desempenho mais potente ou prolongar a duração da turbo do clock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Quando a CPU estiver rodando abaixo de suas limitações, ela pode acelerar a velocidade de clock para oferecer desempenho cache L2 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um cache L1 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um de clock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810O multiplicador de clock controla a velocidade da L3 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835Um cache L3 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um suportar memória mais rápida, fornecendo melhor desempenho ao memória DDR Double Data Rate é o tipo mais comum de memória RAM. As versões mais recentes de memória DDR suportam velocidades máximas mais altas e consomem menos quantidade máxima de memória RAM.Esta é a taxa máxima de dados que podem ser lidos ou armazenados na canais de memória aumenta a velocidade de transferência de dados entre a memória e a eMMC Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Um versão mais elevada de eMMC permite interfaces de memória mais rápidos, o que tem um efeito positivo no desempenho do dispositivo. Por exemplo, quando transfere arquivos de seu computador para um armazenamento interno usando código corretor de erros de memória pode detectar e corrigir dados corrompidos. Ele é usado quando é essencial evitar corrupção, tal como em computação científica ou ao se executar um sistema em um chip SoC tem um chip celular LTE integrado. O LTE é capaz de fazer downloads a velocidades mais rápidas do que a antiga tecnologia velocidade de download é uma medida da largura de banda da conexão à internet, representando a taxa máxima de transferência de dados em que um dispositivo pode acessar conteúdo velocidade de upload é uma medida da largura de banda da conexão à internet, representando a taxa máxima de transferência de dados em que um dispositivo pode enviar informações para um servidor ou outro tecnologia integrada no processador para proteger o dispositivo para uso com ferramentas como pagamentos móveis e streaming de vídeo usando gerenciamento de direitos digitais DRM.A tecnologia multithreading como Hyperthreading da Intel ou Multithreading Simultâneo da AMD fornece um maior desempenho dividindo cada um dos núcleos físicos do processador em núcleos virtuais, também conhecidos como threads. Dessa forma, cada núcleo pode executar dois fluxos de instruções ao mesmo bit ajuda a proteger o computador de ataques fornece aceleração para processamento de mídia, tal como escutar AES é usado para acelerar a criptografia e a Floating-Point VFP é usado pelo processador para entregar desempenho aumentado em áreas tais como imagem 5 é um benchmark multiplataforma que mede o desempenho de núcleo único de um processador. Fonte Primate Labs, 2023Geekbench 5 é um benchmark multiplataforma que mede o desempenho de múltiplos núcleos de um processador. Fonte Primate Labs, 2023resultado PassMark Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU usando múltiplas PassMark único Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU usando uma única PassMark em overclock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU enquanto ela está com Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9200 PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 7c Plus Gen 3Exibir tudo Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 vs Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Samsung Exynos 9810Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Mobile Platform MSM8998 is a high-end SoC for smartphones mostly Android based that was released early 2017. Its one of the first processors that is manufactured in 10 nm LPE FinFET at Samsung. The SD835 is the successor to the Snapdragon 821. It integrates 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for performance and 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X16 LTE modem, WiFi, a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller, an UFS controller, Hexagon 682 DSP, Spectra 180 Image Seonsor Prozessor, Bluetooth GPS, GLONASS, Baeidou, Galileo Satellite Exynos 9825 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9825 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in the Samsung Note 10 line in August 2019. The processor integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to GHz up from GHz in the 9820. Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ. The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro 8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload. The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores. Thanks to higher clock rates, the G76 is now a bit faster compared to the Exynos 9820. The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. Due to the slight changes in clock rates, it is very comparable to the older Eynos 9 9820. Maybe in longer load phases, the improved 7nm process helps to maintain clock speeds a bit better. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 7nm LPP with EUV process that should improve power efficiency compared to the Exynos Exynos 9810 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series at least partly. It integrates eight CPU cores octa core in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898. The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports LTE for up to Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload. As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20. Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card. The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos as before 4k120 and VP9 de- and encoding. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process that should also help with some of the performance Snapdragon 835 8998Samsung Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos 9810SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonSamsung ExynosSamsung ExynosCodenameKryo 280Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Clock2450 MHz1900 - 2730 MHz 3000 MillionTechnology10 nm7 nm10 nmFeaturesX16 LTE Modem, Adreno 540 GPU, Hexagon DSP, Spectra 180 Camera, Aqstic Audio, IZat Location, Haven SecurityARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 LPDDR4x Memory ControllerARM Mali-G72MP18 GPU , 4x Exynos M3 max GHz, 4x Cortex-A55 max GHz LPDDR4x Memory ControlleriGPUQualcomm Adreno 540 - 710 MHzARM Mali-G76 MP12ARM Mali-G72 MP18ArchitectureARMARMARMAnnounced ManufacturerQualcomm Snapdragon SD 835Samsung Exynos Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos Exynos 9810Series Exynos Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos 9825 - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos 9810 - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos 9810 - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55BenchmarksCinebench - Cinebench CPU Multi 64 BitCinebench - Cinebench CPU Single 64 BitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single 32bitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi 32bit3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physicsmin 1493 avg 1501 median 4% max 1508 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 6729 avg 19196 median 20406 17% max 23046 Points min 31908 avg 32588 median 32588 27% max 33268 Points min 18756 avg 23944 median 26226 22% max 26851 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 1520 avg 2849 median 2969 37% max 3161 Points min 3389 avg 3519 median 3519 44% max 3649 Points min 2546 avg 2717 median 33% max 3120 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 1631 avg 2766 median 2960 42% max 3189 Points min 3498 avg 3622 median 3622 52% max 3746 Points min 2561 avg 2752 median 38% max 3148 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 805 avg 814 median 4% max 822 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2177 avg 2184 median 2184 7% max 2191 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1809 avg 1917 median 1920 20% max 1973 Points min 4549 avg 4550 median 4550 47% max 4551 Points min 3688 avg 3721 median 3698 38% max 3776 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 6006 avg 6515 median 6517 7% max 6799 Points min 10367 avg 10426 median 12% max 10484 Points min 8786 avg 8874 median 8874 10% max 8963 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 814 avg 1733 median 2021 29% max 2075 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2952 avg 5482 median 15% max 6552 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Coremin 3960 avg 4100 median 4100 7% max 4240 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Coremin 1144 avg 1155 median 1155 23% max 1166 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5674 avg 6126 median 6126 10% max 6578 Points min 5895 avg 5915 median 5915 9% max 5935 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1933 avg 1954 median 1954 29% max 1975 Points min 1961 avg 1965 median 1965 29% max 1969 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 1810 avg 2308 median 2308 19% max 2806 Points min 895 avg 1039 median 1039 8% max 1183 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 2528 avg 3500 median 32% max 4471 Points min 1898 avg 2002 median 18% max 2105 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11609 avg 12054 median 24% max 12498 Points min 10213 avg 10328 median 10328 20% max 10443 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5777 avg 5936 median 12% max 6094 Points min 5651 avg 5656 median 5656 11% max 5661 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 7193 avg 7226 median 7226 19% max 7259 Points min 6025 avg 6099 median 16% max 6172 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score min 2425 avg 3219 median 3175 4% max 4813 ms min 2478 avg 2503 median 2503 3% max 2528 ms min 2060 avg 2509 median 2394 3% max 3189 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score min 210 avg median 3% max 387 ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 3086 avg 11209 median 11484 11% max 14300 Points min 18908 avg 19022 median 18% max 19135 Points min 12933 avg 14397 median 14% max 15233 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 97 avg median 25% max 118 Points min 63 avg median 68 16% max 72 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 150208 avg 173235 median 175032 60% max 185487 Points min 291772 avg 292608 median 292608 100% max 293444 Points min 214090 avg 218110 median 217950 74% max 222290 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 8164 avg 9635 median 27% max 16148 Points min 18280 avg 18321 median 56% max 18361 Points min 7800 avg 8235 median 8294 25% max 8612 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 42180 avg 44325 median 53% max 47943 Points min 70640 avg 70670 median 87% max 70699 Points min 53528 avg 55588 median 55698 68% max 57538 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 77533 avg 82910 median 83517 26% max 85868 Points min 155432 avg 155907 median 155906 48% max 156381 Points min 91292 avg 92956 median 92887 29% max 94690 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 68241 avg 71814 median 44% max 73371 Points min 101869 avg 102259 median 102259 63% max 102649 Points min 80534 avg 86884 median 88577 54% max 91540 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 201881 avg 208685 median 208251 37% max 217442 Points min 347082 avg 347156 median 347156 61% max 347229 Points min 236552 avg 243663 median 243861 43% max 250577 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total ScorePassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 121702 avg 154312 median 154312 20% max 186922 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Battery Lifemin 476 avg 551 median 11% max 585 min PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 3393 avg 3679 median 3705 20% max 3874 Points min 2385 avg 2407 median 2407 13% max 2429 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 3927 avg 4679 median 4655 10% max 5195 Points min 5088 avg 5342 median 11% max 5595 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 5603 avg 6743 median 44% max 7510 Points min 8801 avg 8914 median 8914 58% max 9027 Points min 5184 avg 5411 median 5305 35% max 5851 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 6854 avg 7925 median 40% max 9927 Points min 11011 avg 11412 median 11412 57% max 11813 Points min 5736 avg 6022 median 5891 29% max 6571 Points Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 → 100% n=30Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9825 → 163% n=30Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 107% n=30 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 12. 2221290 checking url part for id 8554 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 11485 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 9632 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8554 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 8554 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11485 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 11485 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9632 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 9632 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 15 return log +0s ... Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 Update 2017-09-11

snapdragon 835 vs exynos 9810